← Search

Kathleen Spellman

— year-end
156 matches · 70W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Spellman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
L
2026-08-04 · SCWB-Farrell 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Riki Iida mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-31 · SCWB-Farrell 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thuan Tran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-29 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 NW F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · SCWB-Farrell 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Cupples mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-21 · NAC-Detizio 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Schalek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-07-09 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen McDiarmid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-08 · SCWB-Chen 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vikki Hennard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-07 · FAC-Steiner 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geri Bulka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-06 · NAC-Chen 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meg Mateer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Riya Cao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-23 · NAC-Detizio 55s 7.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam DeTizio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · SCWB-Farrell 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yuji Shimizu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
84%
21W–4L · 65.6% of games
4.0
35.9%
33W–59L · 45% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 44.1% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.9% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 24% of the time
#1 Singles
24%
37 matches
#2 Singles
20%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
19 matches
#3 Singles
9%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal