← Search

Tasha Springer

— year-end
35 matches · 22W–13L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Tasha Springer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Hoover CC - Goetz/Watts · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-19 · Hoover C. Club - Steely · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tabitha Hardman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · Hoover C. Club - Steely · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tabitha Hardman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-22 · Hoover C. Club - Steely · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tabitha Hardman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · HCC - Bolt/Gammill 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · HCC - Bolt/Gammill 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Riggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-20 · HCC - Bolt/Gammill 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-13 · HCC - Bolt/Gammill 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clair Gammill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-30 · HCC - Bolt/Gammill 40+ · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-10 · Hoover CC - Adams/Watts · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-2
W
2026-01-28 · Hoover CC - Adams/Watts · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-06 · Hoover CC - Adams/Watts · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams14 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
71.4%
20W–8L · 61.4% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 47.7% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
16 matches
#1 Singles
34%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer