← Search

Jeffrey Siegel

Bow, NH
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 26W–16L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Siegel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2025-12-06 · ALG:Page:Morrow · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher McCallum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-11-22 · ALG:Page:Morrow · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher McCallum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-11-10 · ALG:Page:Morrow · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Horan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-06-29 · BB:Cistulli:Siegel · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Bondaruk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2024-06-01 · BB:Cistulli:Siegel · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Larry Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-04-20 · ALG:Duckless · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Larry Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-04-13 · ALG:Page:Morrow · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Lavoie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-02-10 · ALG:Duckless · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Larry Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2023-11-19 · ALG:Page:Morrow · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Page
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-10-08 · ALG:Page:Morrow · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Lavoie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2023-06-11 · BB:Cistulli:Siegel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Cistulli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-05-24 · BB:Cistulli:Siegel · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bruce Leibig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 57.7% of games
4.5
50%
5W–5L · 53% of games
8.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 59.3% of games
9.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
43%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal