← Search

Nita Hollis

— year-end
64 matches · 30W–34L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Nita Hollis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Fisher/Baas/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Roberson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-20 · Fisher/Baas/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carolyn Baron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-18 · Hollis/Shulman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Erin Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · Hollis/Whitson/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Kreis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-23 · Jones/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Tilley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · Jones/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Constance Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-16 · Jones/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joann Covington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-06 · Kirkland/Archer/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanie Barrier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · Rutherford/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Murak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-20 · Simoneaux/Byrd/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Byrd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-04-10 · Hollis/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Hope Kirkland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-08 · Kirkland/Archer/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celia Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Teams71 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
80%
12W–3L · 54.6% of games
4.0
41%
16W–23L · 45.3% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.1% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer