← Search

Jennifer McSweeney

Andover, MA
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 35W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer McSweeney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
L
2026-05-14 · IRCC: Indian Ridge:Edelmann/Evans · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-27 · WOB:Serves You Right: Carey · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Hemman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-27 · WOB:Serves You Right: Carey · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Fridella mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
2025-12-05 · WOB:Woburn:Carey/Yure · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Pugliese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-05-27 · IRCC:Indian Ridge:Edelmann/Evans · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Breakey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-05-13 · IRCC:Indian Ridge:Edelmann/Evans · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adele Manty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-11 · WOB:Not My Fault:Carey · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jinbyung Chae mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-28 · WOB:Not My Fault:Carey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter DeBarros mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-12-05 · WOB:Woburn:Carey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Dickason mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-11-08 · WOB:Woburn:Carey · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arturo Vegas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-23 · IRCC:Indian Ridge Blue:Edelmann/Evans · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adele Manty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-05-28 · IRCC:Indian Ridge Blue:Edelmann/Evans · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
28.6%
8W–20L · 45.5% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 40.5% of games
7.0mixed
55.2%
16W–13L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 60.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#1 Singles
16%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams