← Search

Carole Jablon-Bernardi

Las Vegas, NV
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 32W–74L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Carole Jablon-Bernardi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
W
2026-02-27 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie D'Amato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-23 · DTC #2 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie D'Amato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-16 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Lavigne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-14 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gerri Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-07 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anchulee Carranza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-31 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anchulee Carranza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-10-21 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-14 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-10 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rhona Alter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-30 · DTC #2 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-16 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Peccole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-09 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Monica Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
40.9%
18W–26L · 47.4% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 26.9% of games
6.0
26.9%
14W–38L · 40.1% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe