← Search

Amber Candelaria

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
178 matches · 71W–107L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amber Candelaria to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history178 matches
L
2026-04-18 · TPC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-28 · TPC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-12-06 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-23 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-11 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachael Boyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-04 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashly Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-20 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanessa Nicole Rowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-13 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-31 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanessa Nicole Rowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-22 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-10 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-12 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
60%
21W–14L · 58.8% of games
3.5
37.2%
45W–76L · 44.7% of games
4.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 37.5% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
35 matches
#4 Doubles
14%
24 matches
#2 Singles
11%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert