← Search

Laurie Ramocki

— year-end
36 matches · 5W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Laurie Ramocki to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-03-09 · TPC Racquet Rebels 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Capece
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-23 · TPC Racquet Rebels 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristine Tabone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-16 · TPC Racquet Rebels 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laurie Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-03 · TPC Racquet Rebels 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristine Tabone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-02 · TPC Racquet Rebels 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristine Tabone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-19 · TPC Racquet Rebels 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristine Tabone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-12 · TPC Racquet Rebels 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristine Tabone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-22 · SSC Grossman 55 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Grossman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-03-17 · SSC Grossman 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Carothers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-14 · SSC Grossman 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Carothers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-03-03 · SSC Grossman 55 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Grossman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-01-20 · SSC Grossman 55 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Teams17 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–6L · 17.2% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 33.7% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 35.9% of games
7.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
14%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer