← Search

Paul Kissner

— year-end
184 matches · 130W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Paul Kissner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
W
2026-07-30 · Chestnut Ridge - 55+ 9.0 M · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Larry Teitelbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-1
W
2026-07-23 · Chestnut Ridge - 55+ 9.0 M · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Lerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-27 · Chestnut Top Guns - 40+ 4.5 M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dennis Chorny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-18 · MTDZ: Maximum Tennis 40 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Yuka Endo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-13 · MTDZ: Maximum Tennis 40 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Yuka Endo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · with Helene Ginsburg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2025-12-06 · MTDZ: Maximum Tennis 40 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Fernandez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
Antonio Cunha / Vivek Naik
2025-10-25 · #1 Doubles · with RD Ferman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-10-24 · #4 Doubles · with RD Ferman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-04 · Chestnut Ridge Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Kendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-18 · #3 Doubles · with Greg Leeds championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
David Schwartz / Joseph Graziano
2025-08-10 · #4 Doubles · with RD Ferman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Teams56 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
68.8%
44W–20L · 59.7% of games
8.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 70.2% of games
9.0
71.4%
15W–6L · 60.9% of games
8.0mixed
77.1%
54W–16L · 59.6% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
34 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova