← Search

Frederick Smith

Ypsilanti, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 64W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Frederick Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-06-17 · HV-Smith 55s 8.0M F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-12 · HV-Bieniek 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Belcher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · HV-Smith 55s 8.0M F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Darrell Washington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-29 · HV-Bieniek 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Roth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-06 · 3CHIP-Douglass 85 COMBO MEN F · #1 Doubles · with Jonathan Heinzman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-01 · 3CHIP-Douglass 85 COMBO MEN F · #1 Doubles · with Chris Theriot
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-12 · 3CHIP-Douglass 85 COMBO MEN F · #3 Doubles · with Chris Theriot
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
Dae-Hee Kwak / Woosim Suh
2025-08-25 · 5CHIPPEWA-BOWMAN MEN LOW 40 35 30 AUG TRI SEM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luke Mathew
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-08-20 · 5CHIPPEWA-BOWMAN MEN LOW 40 35 30 AUG TRI SEM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carlton Lartigue
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
David Bilson / John Hughes
2025-08-18 · 5CHIPPEWA-BOWMAN MEN LOW 40 35 30 AUG TRI SEM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terry Bowman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-13 · 4HV-SMITH 80M WE 55&O SEM · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-06 · 4HV-SMITH 80M WE 55&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
46.4%
26W–30L · 50.8% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
10W–10L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 46.4% of games
7.5mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
35 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe