← Search

Brendan MacDonnell

Brooklyn, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 55W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brendan MacDonnell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
W
2026-07-27 · Metro: Helene/Katz · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Goldston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-20 · Metro: Helene/Katz · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mitchell Berger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-14 · Metro: Helene/Katz · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Sheridan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Andrew Kimball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Thomas Holz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
Michael Dalton / Mitchell Berger
2025-09-13 · #1 Doubles · with Whitney Tilson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · with Whitney Tilson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-12 · Mindich · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas Holz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-07-22 · Metro: Helene/Katz · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Goldston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-16 · Metro: Helene/Katz · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jayson Blau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-01 · Mindich · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Neil Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-04-27 · Mindich · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas Holz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
60.9%
28W–18L · 51.6% of games
8.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 56.4% of games
9.0
0%
0W–7L · 42.6% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.1% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer