← Search

Brian Riddle

Austin, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 42W–55L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Brian Riddle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-06-21 · Servin' Bourbon · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephen Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Daniel Berman / Matt Johnson
2026-06-14 · Servin' Bourbon · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ronaldo Batista
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · Servin' Bourbon · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Bergeron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Servin' Bourbon · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ronaldo Batista
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · Servin' Bourbon · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ronaldo Batista
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-29 · Couples Therapy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Riddle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
Matthew Frederick / Mark Sullivan
2026-03-22 · Servin' Bourbon · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rob Beckham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · Servin' Bourbon · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Weisblatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-03-01 · Couples Therapy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Casey Raynor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-15 · Servin' Bourbon · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-15 · Couples Therapy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Riddle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-08 · Couples Therapy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Riddle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
58.3%
28W–20L · 54.9% of games
3.5
28.2%
11W–28L · 40.7% of games
6.0
50%
3W–3L · 48.3% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 26.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova