← Search

Jeff Futch

Fletcher, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 12W–15L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jeff Futch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2026-09-10 · WNCC Still (HRC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ben Huggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-08 · WNCD Hartsock (BHRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Colin Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-22 · WNCV Johnson (ARC South) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Melnyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
Dan Anderson / John Vesel
2026-08-18 · WNCD Hartsock (BHRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Colin Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · WNCC Still (HRC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Westmoreland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-27 · WNCM Shanor (Brevard) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Liebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · WNC Qualifying Team · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Burton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
9-8
W
2026-05-06 · WNCM Shanor (Brevard) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Snowdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · WNCJ Futch (Etowah) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-25 · WNCJ Futch (Etowah) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Troy Buggle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · WNC Qualifying Team · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Burton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
9-8
L
2026-04-08 · WNCM Shanor (Brevard) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victor Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 49.7% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.5% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.5% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova