← Search

Janet Gillespie

Mendham, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 23W–27L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Janet Gillespie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2025-04-10 · Chester 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Lustig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-06 · Chester 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Seaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-13 · Chester 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-01-30 · Chester 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Reiman-Auriemma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2024-12-05 · Chester 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Preskar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-11-21 · Chester 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Oates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-10-24 · Chester 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Suchanek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-10 · Chester 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Ajavananda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-09-19 · Chester 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Preskar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2024-05-29 · Ballsy Babes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Braumann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-11-10 · Randolph · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Seaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-09-29 · Randolph · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Kavanaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
46%
23W–27L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer