← Search

Mark Wlodarczyk

— year-end
61 matches · 29W–32L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Mark Wlodarczyk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-07-13 · Smash Bros 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackson Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-07-08 · Smash Bros 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Vega
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-08 · Smash Bros 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kurt Meichtry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · Smash Bros 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dennis Vanill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-27 · Smash Bros 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Vega
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-18 · Smash Bros 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Medina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-01 · Smash Bros · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Lancer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-10-12 · Smash Bros · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Selwyn Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Mathieu Barthelemy / Griffin Bond
2025-05-19 · Unit Turn 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Crockett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-12 · Unit Turn 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Vega
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-04-26 · Smash Bros · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-02 · Smash Bros · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Cicero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
70%
14W–6L · 59.9% of games
4.0
36.8%
14W–24L · 43.2% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer