← Search

Shelena Sanderson

Owings Mills, MD
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
353 matches · 206W–147L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Shelena Sanderson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history353 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Ioannou 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ann Greenbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-15 · Ioannou 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anne Blue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-10 · Barry - Danielle's Baseline Warriors · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Danielle Barry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Nicole Parker / Jackie Berens
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Tara Okieffe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Kelly Blackborow / Cindy Pham
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Tara Okieffe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-05 · Ioannou 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexandra Chafey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · Lim 4.5 Women · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Quynh Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · Lim 4.5 Women · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Samantha Gass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-28 · Barry - Danielle's Baseline Warriors · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Barbara Citrano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · Anderson & Anderson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Sine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-2
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Tara Okieffe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Tara Okieffe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams92 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 44.6% of games
4.5
56.6%
90W–69L · 52.2% of games
8.0
84.6%
22W–4L · 62.2% of games
8.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 54.9% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
67.6%
23W–11L · 59.7% of games
8.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 45.5% of games
9.0mixed
53.6%
15W–13L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
150 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
93 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
89 matches
#1 Singles
4%
15 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer