← Search

Gerald Kane

Malvern, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 8W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gerald Kane to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-06-20 · UMLY Racketeers · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-06 · UMLY Racketeers · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-30 · UMLY Racketeers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Tyahla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-16 · UMLY Racketeers · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-14 · UMLY Racketeers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jozef Everts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · UMLY Racketeers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Spain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-4
L
2026-05-02 · UMLY Racketeers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jozef Everts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-21 · Wild Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with So Young Jang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · Wild Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with So Young Jang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-07 · Wild Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with So Young Jang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-06-28 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Dan Cook / Scott Frey
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Hickey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
14.7%
5W–29L · 28.7% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.6% of games
7.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 25% of the time
#1 Singles
25%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
9 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova