← Search

Christopher Berger

Chagrin Falls, OH
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 11W–1L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Christopher Berger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history12 matches
W
Michael Karder / William Fox
2026-07-18 · A65 7.0M NC Christman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joe Zabowski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · A65 7.0M NC Christman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jack Layne
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-14 · A55 7.0M CV Sues · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Kinnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · A55 7.0M CV Sues · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Sues
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-07 · A55 7.0M CV Sues · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Whittaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-09 · X55 7.0 CV Lockert · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Mallak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
Michelle Fox / William Fox
2025-10-26 · X55 7.0 CV Lockert · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Mallak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-09-28 · X55 7.0 CV Lockert · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Mallak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
William Scott / Suber Huang
2025-05-19 · A55 7.0M CV Sues · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marc Groedel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-07-09 · OH NEO A55 7.0M Lockert · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Sues
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-06-11 · OH NEO A55 7.0M Lockert · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Sussman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-05-21 · OH NEO A55 7.0M Lockert · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Sues
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 58.4% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 67% of the time
#3 Doubles
67%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova