← Search

Ruthanne Wannop

— year-end
64 matches · 9W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ruthanne Wannop to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-07-10 · Hartman/Garland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rhonda Wieder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · Hartman/Garland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Blackwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-01 · May the Tape Be With You · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Hoehn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · Hartman/Garland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rhonda Wieder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · May the Tape Be With You · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sherry Frost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-03 · May the Tape Be With You · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sherry Frost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · May the Tape Be With You · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sherry Frost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-16 · Hartman/Garland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rhonda Wieder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · Hartman/Garland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rhonda Wieder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-16 · May the Tape Be With You · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Seshi Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-09 · May the Tape Be With You · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marlene Dashkoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-08 · Hartman/Garland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Nappo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
20.7%
6W–23L · 38.3% of games
3.5
4%
1W–24L · 29.9% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 31.1% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova