← Search

James Lauer

Granger, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 47W–21L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add James Lauer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
Steven Hibler / Peter Rogers
2025-10-11 · NIN SB A 65&O 8.0 M: Toner · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Norris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Daniel Cole / James Olson
2025-09-13 · NIN SB A 65&O 8.0 M: Toner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Toner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
Mark Smith / Tim Sullivan
2025-08-22 · NIN SB A 65&O 8.0 M: Toner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Norris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
Brian Norris / Deepak Veeramasuneni
2025-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Hostetler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Hostetler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
Deepak Veeramasuneni / Ryan Ross
2025-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kendall Hottell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Lawmaster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-07-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Hostetler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-16 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Bessler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Deepak Veeramasuneni / Ryan Ross
2025-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas Catapano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Pickering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-06-04 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas Catapano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
85.3%
29W–5L · 61.1% of games
4.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 46% of games
8.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 49.1% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal