← Search

Kim Shaw

— year-end
21 matches · 13W–8L · seasons 2022–2024

Captains: add Kim Shaw to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
L
2024-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kasey Hamlin-Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2024-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-01-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Diminich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2023-10-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Hendrix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2023-10-19 · LCTA18/Pernell/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Donahue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
Morgan Scruggs / Nicole Scruggs
2023-10-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Catherine MacKelcan / Jennifer Weaver
2023-10-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Pernell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2023-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Ann Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-04-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Scolnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2023-03-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2023-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Hopkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams16 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 61.7% of games
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.5% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova