← Search

Derek Seibert

Scottsdale, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
236 matches · 91W–145L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Derek Seibert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history236 matches
L
2026-08-19 · 8.5 SRP Sauter/Landrum · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Arielle Shinder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-01 · 8.5 SRP Sauter/Landrum · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Avery Walta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · 8.5 SRP Sauter/Landrum · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lindsey Henke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · 8.5 SRP Sauter/Landrum · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Avery Walta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · 8.0 PTC Abney M55S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Riddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-03 · 4.0 SRP Sauter/Win Thu W18S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Sauter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-01 · 4.0 KIW GOATs M18S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Malick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-29 · PHX/Abney/40&O/4.5X · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Pacione mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-27 · 4.0 SRP Sauter/Win Thu W18S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Sauter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-25 · 4.0 KIW GOATs M18S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Bordelon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-03-21 · 8.0 PTC Abney M55S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Riddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-20 · 4.0 SRP Sauter/Win Thu W18S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Sauter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
4.0
45.5%
25W–30L · 47.8% of games
4.5
38.5%
15W–24L · 42.4% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 48.1% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 55% of games
4.0mixed
68.4%
13W–6L · 59.2% of games
4.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.2% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
28.3%
13W–33L · 44% of games
8.5mixed
30%
3W–7L · 38.8% of games
9.0mixed
28.8%
15W–37L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
87 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
70 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert