← Search

Randy Andell

— year-end
26 matches · 6W–20L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Randy Andell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
2026-08-09 · Chief Peak · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barry Rothstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Frank Swanson / Yong Cheng
2026-07-25 · Chief Peak · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Roy Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-31 · Mission Oaks Warriors · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Crane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-31 · Elings-String Theory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Mikeska
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · Mission Oaks Warriors · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ilan Elkabetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · Mission Oaks Warriors · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Crane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · Mission Oaks Warriors · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Humfreville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-26 · Mission Oaks Warriors · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Crane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-22 · Elings-String Theory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Mikeska
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · Elings-String Theory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Mikeska
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-11 · Elings-String Theory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-09-21 · Mission Oaks Warriors · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Humfreville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
21.1%
4W–15L · 39% of games
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova