Christy Duren
Tuscaloosa, AL
39 matches · 13W–26L · seasons 2025–2026
Captains: add Christy Duren to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history39 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2027
IHCC Killian 40+ 3.0
IHCC Killian 55+ 3.0
TTC Lambert Fall 2027 3.0 weeknight
Canterbury IHCC
Duren 18+ 3.5 Mixed
Duren 18+ Mixed Winter Tournament
Duren 40+ Mixed Winter Tournament
IHCC - Philippi
IHCC Killian
IHCC Killian 3.0
IHCC Killian 40+ 6.5
NRYC Sandras 3.5
NRYC Sandras 3.5 18s
Non playing
TTC - 40+ 3.0/3.5/4.0 - McKnight
TTC Lambert Fall Combo 6.5
TU - Duren
TU - McKnight
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 51.6% of games
3.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 35% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 38.9% of games
3.5mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 51.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
10 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.