← Search

Laurie Puddester

— year-end
103 matches · 56W–47L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Laurie Puddester to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
W
2026-05-12 · Pelican Marsh / Barger · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Nelson-Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-11 · Olde Cypress / Navarro · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathleen Iverson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-05 · Pelican Marsh / Barger · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Nelson-Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-28 · Pelican Marsh / Barger · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gretchen Landolt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · Olde Cypress / Navarro · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathleen Iverson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-14 · Pelican Marsh / Barger · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Nelson-Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-07 · Pelican Marsh / Barger · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Nelson-Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-24 · Pelican Marsh / Barger · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Nelson-Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
Tammy Finlinson / Amy Gardner
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · with Michele Nelson-Baker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-03 · Pelican Marsh / Barger · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Nelson-Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-24 · Pelican Marsh / Barger · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Nelson-Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-23 · Olde Cypress / Navarro · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Catino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
62.2%
28W–17L · 55.1% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.9% of games
8.0
65.6%
21W–11L · 59.1% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
0%
0W–9L · 31.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
22 matches
#1 Singles
10%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer