← Search

Lilya Matos

— year-end
50 matches · 30W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lilya Matos to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-06-21 · Love Hurts · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Estefania Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · Shavano Sneekers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Ratner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-2
W
2026-06-13 · Sets in the City · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Terrie Butcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · Shavano Sneekers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joy Girouard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-30 · Shavano Sneekers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Celina Gale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-17 · Shavano Sneekers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christi Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-22 · Double Trouble · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Konop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-07 · Love Hurts · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bonnie Tompsett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Marina Henkes / Catherine Brown
2026-02-22 · Shavano Spice Squirrels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Hurt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · Love Hurts · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bonnie Tompsett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-08 · Love Hurts · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Viviane van Poppel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Lori Martin / Melissa Cliver
2026-02-07 · Shavano Spice Squirrels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Hurt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Teams49 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
55.8%
24W–19L · 52.3% of games
4.0
100%
5W–0L · 60.8% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams