← Search

Claudia Larocque

Manchester, CT
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 10W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Claudia Larocque to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
L
2026-02-28 · MLM:Lincer/ · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Veilleux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-21 · MLM:Lincer/ · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Giudice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-13 · MLM:Lincer/ · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emily Plocharczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-22 · MLM:Lincer/ · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carlene Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-08 · MLM:Lincer/ · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carlene Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-31 · MLM:2.5 Women:Lincer/ · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Natalie Osman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-12 · MLM:2.5 Women:Lincer/ · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carlene Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-06 · MLM:2.5 Women:Lincer/ · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laryssa Balaban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-01 · MLM:2.5 Women:Lincer/ · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laryssa Balaban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-04-23 · GTC:Racquet Science:Nadeau/ODonnell · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane ODonnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2023-04-15 · RH:Twisted Strings:LaVigne · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Wiknik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-04-01 · RH:Twisted Strings:LaVigne · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Wiknik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–9L · 21.7% of games
3.0
12.1%
4W–29L · 30.6% of games
6.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 82% of the time
#3 Doubles
82%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe