← Search

Jim Alford

Lancaster, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 15W–16L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jim Alford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-06-06 · MCTA 3.5M 65 & Over (Alford) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Hanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-09 · MCTA55/Alford/USCL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chin Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-11 · MCTA75/Alford/USCL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cary Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-10 · MCTA75/Alford/USCL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cary Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
Steven Wright / Thomas Romance
2025-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chin Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
David Drossman / Theodore Camburn
2025-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glen Wensley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
David Richardson / Charles Sabathne
2025-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chin Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Andrew Lombardo / Patrick Taylor
2025-01-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Allcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
James Bradford / Paul Horne
2024-09-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
Joseph OBrien / David Richardson
2024-09-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chin Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Leland Greeley / David Richardson
2024-08-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jerry Holman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
48.4%
15W–16L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova