← Search

Dan Kartes

Denver, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 27W–21L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dan Kartes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-09-10 · LDTU-Turek-Levy/Westport · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrew Orr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-27 · LDTU-Turek-Levy/Westport · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrew Orr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-20 · LDTU-Turek-Levy/Westport · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with George Simonetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · MLPRE-Reid/Westport 55+ 3.0 Mixed Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with JoAnna Kauffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-20 · MLGCH-CHAST/WESTPORT 65+ 3.0 MX · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Enright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · MLPRE-Reid/Westport 55+ 3.0 Mixed Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie McConnell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · MLPRE-Reid/Westport 55+ 3.0 Mixed Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacie Zerfoss mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · MLGCH-CHAST/WESTPORT 65+ 3.0 MX · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-15 · MLGCH-CHAST/WESTPORT 65+ 3.0 MX · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Rowland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · MLPRE-Reid/Westport 55+ 3.0 Mixed Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie McConnell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-03 · MLPRE-Reid/Westport 55+ 3.0 Mixed Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with JoAnna Kauffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-14 · LGCH-Chast/Westport 65+ 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Norm Kowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 68% of games
3.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 42.5% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 45.3% of games
3.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 64.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
12 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams