← Search

Jill Shearer

— year-end
79 matches · 36W–43L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Jill Shearer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
L
2022-08-28 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lance Allgower mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2022-08-07 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rod Faircloth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2022-05-13 · RED ROCK CC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Donaldson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
Jeannie Collins / Kathy King
2022-02-26 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brigitte Fallon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-02-20 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Lugering mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-02-08 · RED ROCK CC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Donaldson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2022-01-30 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with COLE BOREN mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2022-01-22 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Donaldson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2022-01-15 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lara Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2021-11-09 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Blais
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2021-10-26 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Miriam Jimenez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2021-10-12 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Miriam Jimenez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams16 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
37.7%
20W–33L · 46.6% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.7% of games
6.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 52% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 44.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
8 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova