← Search

Rae Woods

— year-end
236 matches · 117W–119L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rae Woods to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history236 matches
L
2026-09-14 · 2026 Adult 65 & Over 7.0W Guttierez - JC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Cloud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-10 · 2026 Adult 65 & Over 7.0W Guttierez - JC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Chase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · Mixed 3.5X Briggs - JC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nate Tapia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · Mixed 3.5X Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Tanner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · 55 & Over 7.0W Goldstein - JC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Denning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · 55 & Over 7.0W Goldstein - JC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Cloud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
Christine Ellis / David Ellis
2026-06-29 · Mixed 3.5X Briggs - JC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darren Hibray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-06-21 · 40 & Over 3.5X Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nate Tapia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-10 · 55 & Over 7.0W Goldstein - JC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Denning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-05 · 40 & Over 3.5X Briggs - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Zanoni mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-13 · 40 & Over 3.5X Briggs - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Zanoni mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Laura Wilson / Keiko Uehara
2026-04-18 · 18 & Over 3.5W Brock - HP · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Lofton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Teams53 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
55.7%
54W–43L · 53.6% of games
4.0
25%
11W–33L · 43.7% of games
7.0
69.4%
25W–11L · 57.2% of games
8.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 50% of games
3.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 52.8% of games
7.0mixed
47.2%
17W–19L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
43 matches
#2 Singles
12%
29 matches
#1 Singles
12%
28 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams