← Search

Susie Vanderwey

— year-end
49 matches · 40W–9L · seasons 2022–2025

Captains: add Susie Vanderwey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
2025-03-05 · 4.5 PTC Fonseca W40Sam · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Danica Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-12 · 4.5 PTC Fonseca W40Sam · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Danica Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-05 · 4.5 PTC Fonseca W40Sam · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Fenton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-11-13 · 4.0 WIG LederDinan W18F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audrey Feliz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-11-07 · 4.0 WIG LederDinan W18F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Antoniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-10-24 · 4.0 WIG LederDinan W18F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Krista Gomez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2023-10-02 · 4.0 WIG LederDinan W18F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Genissa Leder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-08-29 · 4.0 WIG LederDinan W18F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Todd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
David Chun / Tami Reyes
2023-07-23 · BC-MCC/TonyRojko · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tony Rojko mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2023-06-03 · BC-MCC/TonyRojko · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Shure mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-04-05 · 4.0 WIG LederGomez W18S · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2023-04-04 · 4.0 WIG LederGomez W18S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teri Mogensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams10 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
92.1%
35W–3L · 68.3% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
21 matches
#1 Singles
22%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams