← Search

Cary Goldstein

Cleveland, OH
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
55 matches · 31W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cary Goldstein to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
W
William Davis / Phillip Scandy
2026-07-25 · NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Trapp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Sues
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-11 · NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Whittaker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-09 · NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Sues
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-07-19 · NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom McPhillips
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-06-28 · NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Crider
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-08-25 · OH NEO A65 8.0M Flacks · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Chapel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-1
W
Michael Crider / David Mattox
2023-07-23 · OH NEO A65 8.0M Flacks · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Chapel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
Carl Fazio / Don Brinberg
2023-07-22 · OH NEO A65 7.0M Goldstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bob Grossman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
David Mattox / Mark Weller
2023-07-16 · OH NEO A65 8.0M Flacks · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Lilly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2023-07-15 · OH NEO A65 7.0M Goldstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Trapp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-07-13 · A18 3.5M CV Polcar · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Polcar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 52.8% of games
7.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 60.8% of games
8.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 36.4% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal