Mary Jo Cecil
14 matches · 9W–5L · seasons 2019–2023
Captains: add Mary Jo Cecil to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history14 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Teams6 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 54.1% of games
0.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 57% of the time
#2 Doubles
57%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
2 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
7%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.