← Search

Jackie Kidder

Peachtree Corners, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 27W–28L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jackie Kidder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
L
2026-07-21 · St. Ives (Karen Lange)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diann Denny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Priscilla Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · St. Ives (Karen Lange)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danette Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · St. Ives (Karen Lange)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bridget Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Priscilla Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0
W
2026-06-24 · St. Ives (Karen Lange)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Merritt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · St. Ives (Karen Lange)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Merritt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Talley Richey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 5-7
W
2026-05-28 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Curvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-01-13 · St. Ives (Karen Lange)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Beard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-06 · St. Ives (Karen Lange)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Beard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-09 · St. Ives (Karen Lange)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Rodenhiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
49.1%
27W–28L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams