← Search

Janet Traceski

WEST HARTFORD, CT
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 23W–43L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Janet Traceski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
L
2024-05-16 · RFL:All In:Walsh/Danton · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katharine Kluger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2024-04-25 · RFL:All In:Walsh/Danton · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katharine Kluger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-07 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Eilers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-03-30 · RFL:All In:Ort/ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2024-03-10 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Eilers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2024-02-18 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Eilers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-01-07 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Vaughn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-12-14 · RFL:All In:Ort · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2023-12-10 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2023-12-09 · RFL:All In:Ort/ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisa Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2023-12-07 · RFL:All In:Ort · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katharine Kluger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-11-16 · RFL:All In:Ort · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Herbek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
33.3%
9W–18L · 45.9% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer