← Search

Jason Hays

Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 92W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jason Hays to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
L
Amanda Lubold / Brent Miller
2026-08-19 · Indy X18 8.0 NCHS Redding · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelby Ackerman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-17 · Indy X18 9.0 BHS Hullett · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Abbey Neff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-16 · Indy A18 4.0M WIRC Bruner · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Ferbrache
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · Indy A18 4.0M WIRC Bruner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · Indy X18 8.0 NCHS Redding · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jillian Heaton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · Indy X18 9.0 BHS Hullett · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Krystal Grubb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · Indy A18 4.0M WIRC Bruner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-06 · Indy X18 9.0 IHP Hullett · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Abbey Neff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-02-27 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Redding · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelby Ackerman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-21 · Indy A18 4.0M TUE WIRC Bruner · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Larry Stropes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-13 · Indy X18 8.0 IRCD Redding · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelby Ackerman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-02-03 · Indy A18 4.0M TUE WIRC Bruner · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Ruckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 74.2% of games
4.0
66.1%
39W–20L · 56.2% of games
4.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.7% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
69.7%
23W–10L · 55.3% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.8% of games
8.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
41 matches
#1 Singles
20%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal