← Search

Timothy Miller

— year-end
102 matches · 51W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Timothy Miller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
W
2026-08-27 · BRY: Joan Steere · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angela Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · BRY: Joan Steere · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angela Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
Matthew Charland / Matt Johnson
2026-07-30 · FC: Wyatt/Chisholm · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Rangel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-23 · FC: Wyatt/Chisholm · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-10 · FC: Wyatt/Chisholm · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Dick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 6-2
W
Philip Smith / Adam Cargin
2026-07-09 · FC: Rajabiun/Chisholm · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Rangel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 6-5
W
2026-06-30 · FC: Wyatt/Chisholm · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Rajabiun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-25 · FC: Rajabiun/Chisholm · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-18 · FC: Rajabiun/Chisholm · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Khamphanh Savatdy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · FC: Rajabiun/Chisholm · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Rangel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-04 · FC: Rajabiun/Chisholm · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cesar Fernandes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · FC: Wyatt/Chisholm · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
56.8%
21W–16L · 53% of games
4.5
20%
2W–8L · 36.1% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 65% of games
8.0mixed
43.3%
13W–17L · 47.5% of games
9.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#1 Singles
10%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert