← Search

Todd Greenquist

— year-end
34 matches · 23W–11L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Todd Greenquist to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
W
2026-06-06 · Apex:Faure · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean Dundon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · Apex:Faure · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gene Kucinkas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2024-02-25 · Apex:Faure · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Cameron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-01-14 · Apex:ShankYouVeryMuch!:Faure · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sante Calandri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-10-08 · Apex:MatchMakers:Kryger · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Krystal Talbot mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2023-09-23 · Apex:MatchMakers:Kryger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Morong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-05-21 · Apex:PassingShot:Chadbourne · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with H Terence Hampson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2023-03-12 · Apex:ShankYouVeryMuch:Faure · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Chadbourne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2023-03-12 · Apex:ShankYouVeryMuch:Faure · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with DANIEL DICESARE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-04-23 · RFC:PassingShot:Chadbourne · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with H Terence Hampson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2022-04-23 · RFC:PassingShot:Chadbourne · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Piccolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2022-03-13 · RFC:ShankYouVeryMuch:Faure · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jake Drouin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams14 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
82.6%
19W–4L · 58% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova