← Search

Mary Jo Terry

— year-end
128 matches · 72W–56L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Mary Jo Terry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-05-16 · For the Fun of It · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-11 · Servivors · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Woster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
Kim Harris / Karen Williams
2026-05-04 · Servivors · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Woster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · For the Fun of It · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terees Shinn-Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · 5weet 5hots · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol van Waarde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-05 · For the Fun of It · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristine Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-28 · For the Fun of It · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terees Shinn-Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-22 · 5weet 5hots · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lorina Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-07 · For the Fun of It · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terees Shinn-Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · 5weet 5hots · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lorina Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-01-31 · For the Fun of It · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terees Shinn-Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · For the Fun of It · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terees Shinn-Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
58.4%
45W–32L · 51.6% of games
8.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
58.3%
21W–15L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova