← Search

Karen Bradway

— year-end
169 matches · 62W–107L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Bradway to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history169 matches
W
2026-01-11 · LTC:Love All:Przybyl: League Coordinator · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Hernandez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-06-28 · LTC:Spin Sisters 40+:Tudryn/Ruell · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-21 · BAY: Net Results: Bradway · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacqueline Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-21 · BAY: Net Results: Bradway · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marianne Vinal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-3
W
2025-05-18 · BAY: Net Results: Bradway · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacqueline Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-03 · LTC:Spin Sisters 40+:Tudryn/Ruell · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 5-0
W
2025-04-26 · LTC: Spin Sisters:Ruell/Tudryn · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-04-19 · BAY: Net Results: Bradway · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marianne Vinal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-04-13 · BAY: Western Massacre:Mason/Palmer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Palmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-05 · BAY: Net Results: Bradway · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marianne Vinal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-29 · LTC: Spin Sisters:Ruell/Tudryn · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-22 · LTC: Love All:Cheney · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Hernandez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
34.4%
22W–42L · 44.1% of games
4.0
33.3%
15W–30L · 44.1% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 43.7% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
45.2%
14W–17L · 47.7% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
52 matches
#1 Singles
23%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
35 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer