← Search

Emily Davis

Greenville, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 11W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Emily Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2026-03-19 · UPTA55A/Riley/GCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Seaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-03 · UPTA54FF/Madden/GCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Schipper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-11-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Looper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-11-13 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2025-11-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Seaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Fitzhenry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-10-22 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cate Leatherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-15 · UPTA54FF/Madden/GCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Infinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-09-25 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Fitzhenry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-09-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Fitzhenry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
50%
11W–11L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer