← Search

Marcia Weger

— year-end
117 matches · 57W–60L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Marcia Weger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Skrandel/40/6.5/CWN/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sherry Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-21 · Erwin/55/7.5/CWD/SOAC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Cumbus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · Skrandel/40/6.5/CWN/SOAC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sherry Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-14 · Erwin/55/7.5/CWD/SOAC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Elston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · Weger/40/3.5/MD/SOAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Nevarez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
Valerie DeBosier / Jessica Johnson
2026-07-29 · Skrandel/40/6.5/CWN/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gretchen McCurley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-27 · Elston/40/7.5/CWN/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie LeGrange
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · Weger/40/3.5/MD/SOAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Weger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-05 · BRAUD/55/3.5/MD/SOAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Weger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-03 · Weger/40/3.5/MD/SOAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Weger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · Duplantis/40/Div2/WN/SOAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Cumbus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Missy Love / Charlotte Smith
2026-04-21 · Freeman/18/3.5/WN/SOAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Baggett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams71 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
63.3%
38W–22L · 54.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 32.1% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.6% of games
7.5
39.1%
9W–14L · 47% of games
3.5mixed
23.8%
5W–16L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
27 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe