← Search

Deborah Marks

Columbus, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 22W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deborah Marks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2026-05-04 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandy Richards
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-13 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sara Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-02 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Augspurger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-02-23 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandy Richards
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-01-19 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandy Richards
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-12-10 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Breen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
Julie Jones / Margo Simmons
2025-12-03 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Breen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-12-01 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joy Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-03 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Jolley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Julie Jones / Sue Boudreau
2025-10-22 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Breen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-20 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robbin Northrop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-10-15 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.1% of games
3.5
22.2%
4W–14L · 43.1% of games
6.0
30%
3W–7L · 48% of games
6.5
30.8%
12W–27L · 43.8% of games
7.0
0%
0W–7L · 31.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 58% of the time
#3 Doubles
58%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova