← Search

Kirsten Barnes

Redmond, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 54W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kirsten Barnes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Kerry Levine championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Kerry Levine championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-11 · Levine · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerry Levine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-08 · CP-McAughan · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ping Yeh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · CP-McAughan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristina Edmonson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-01 · CP-McAughan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerry Levine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-11 · CP-McAughan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristina Edmonson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Catie Webster / Allison Wergin
2025-10-25 · #4 Doubles · with Rebecca Redding championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Jennifer Reese / Michelle Ahlquist
2025-10-25 · #3 Doubles · with Kerstin Anderson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Michelle Terriquez / Jackie Stahl
2025-10-24 · #1 Doubles · with Cindy Nordlund championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-10-11 · NWW-CP-Lee · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kerry Levine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-10-04 · NWW-CP-Lee · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ping Yeh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams77 teams · 2002–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
63.6%
35W–20L · 53% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.1% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.8% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer