← Search

Martha Maggi

Olympia, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 60W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Martha Maggi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-05-14 · VAC-Finn · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-08 · VAC-Finn · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Tracy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-30 · VAC-Abegg-Senior Momentums · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Sargeant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-24 · VAC-Abegg-Senior Momentums · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Sargeant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-23 · VAC-Finn · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Tracy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-16 · VAC-Finn · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marybeth Matlock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-10 · VAC-Finn · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Tracy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-08 · VAC-Clerget/Brazel-40Love · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Brazel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-22 · VAC-Peters · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Mazikowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-15 · VAC-Peters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marny Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-14 · VAC-Clerget/Brazel-40Love · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Lucenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-18 · VAC-Peters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marny Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 55.7% of games
3.5
29.4%
10W–24L · 43.3% of games
6.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 57.8% of games
7.0
50%
16W–16L · 47.7% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
22 matches
#1 Singles
9%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert