← Search

Stanley Hanks

Vancouver, WA
0.0 year-end
32 matches · 18W–14L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Stanley Hanks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
Shawn Boyce / Sheldon Sun
2023-03-11 · VTC-Savage · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Hapke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2023-02-26 · VTC-Savage · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Hapke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-01-14 · VTC-Savage · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2022-03-13 · VTC-Schalk/Savage · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Hapke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2022-02-19 · VTC-Schalk/Savage · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Hapke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2020-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angela Benedict mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2020-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Hapke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Brett Warren / Allen VanLeuven
2020-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rolf Ellingsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Shane Kim / Robert Kelly
2020-01-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Hapke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Dennis Reed / Steven Ryan
2019-12-08 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Muckerheide championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Mike Mullen / Robert Wise
2019-12-07 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Muckerheide championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2019-11-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jon Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2022–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
60%
6W–4L · 53% of games
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 63.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
41%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova