← Search

Brad McAmis

Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 15W–16L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Brad McAmis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Brown 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam McAmis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · Brown 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Minerva Loran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · Brown 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam McAmis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-27 · Brown 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam McAmis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · Bradley 55s 4.0M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-07 · Bradley 55s 4.0M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-17 · Bradley 55s 4.0M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Vary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-03 · Bradley 55s 4.0M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2025-10-08 · Vary 55s 7.5 Combo M Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bill Vary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-10-01 · Vary 55s 7.5 Combo M Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Martin Mailloux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2025-09-10 · Vary 55s 7.5 Combo M Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2025-08-20 · Vary 55s 7.5 Combo M Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matt Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 47.4% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.3% of games
4.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 41.7% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova