← Search

Julie Condit

— year-end
171 matches · 112W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Condit to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Noonan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Noonan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-07 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christie Albera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Jeffrey Bowers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Gregory Avola championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-16 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elena Miko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · BTC:Can't Stop the Serving:Song/Albera · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Riether-Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-06 · BTC:Can't Stop the Serving:Song/Albera · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christie Albera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-03 · NHHR:Just Wanna Have Fun:Noonan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Noonan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-26 · MIT: Umbricht/Edwards · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christie Albera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · NHHR:Just Wanna Have Fun:Noonan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Noonan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · NHHR:Just Wanna Have Fun:Noonan · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kirsten Ackerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams38 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
68.5%
89W–41L · 57.1% of games
8.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 60.2% of games
9.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#1 Singles
13%
22 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova