← Search

Tanya Tanner

— year-end
22 matches · 9W–13L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Tanya Tanner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
W
2026-05-18 · LISA BRANEFF · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · LISA BRANEFF · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Dumas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-27 · LISA BRANEFF · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-20 · LISA BRANEFF · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-13 · LISA BRANEFF · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Maldonado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Becky Rutledge / Kathleen Smith
2026-03-09 · LISA BRANEFF · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Whittington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-02 · LISA BRANEFF · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Dumas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-23 · LISA BRANEFF · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beverly Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-06-02 · Racquettes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Dumas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-27 · VICTORIA SMITH · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Whittington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-13 · VICTORIA SMITH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Maldonado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-12 · Racquettes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.9% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 25.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer